It’s offficial:
Samsung Electronics Inc. will launch its first wristwatch smartphone early
next month, people familiar with the plan say. The move would allow Samsung to
potentially beat rival Apple Inc. on what is expected to be the next major
battleground for mobile phone makers.
The world’s largest smartphone maker will unveil its first device worn
around the wrist called Galaxy Gear on Sept. 4, ahead of Berlin’s IFA, a
consumer electronics show where technology companies showcase their gadgets. It
will go on sale this year, the people said.
But, one person said the device won’t have flexible displays, contrary to
the company’s patent filings in the U.S. and South Korea earlier this year that
suggested a device with a bendable screen was in the works.
Analysts had cast doubts about mass producing flexible screens for a couple
of years, making the possibility of wristwatch smartphones grim.
Wearable smart devices have been tipped as the next jackpot niche for
leading handset makers such as Samsung and Apple as the lucrative high-end
segment of the smartphone market worldwide is saturated. Samsung wrested the
world’s largest smartphone maker title away from Apple last year and has pushed
to widen the lead with a portfolio covering a wide array of smartphone and
tablets.
Though the concept of a phone wrapped around one’s wrist has been a widely
known concept for a decade or more, the hype has been building around “smart
watches” recently with both Apple and Samsung prepping devices. Sony in June
showed off a wristwatch-like device that connects with most smartphones running
on Google Inc.’s Android operating system.
It’s still unknown whether Samsung’s new gear will also work via a
conventional smartphone or as a standalone product.
Samsung’s earlier invitations for the same-date product launch was widely
expected to be the next iteration of its phablet device Galaxy Note with a
larger 5-inch screen.
The company also plans to showcase the Galaxy Note 3 at IFA.
Bloomberg reported earlier that Samsung will launch the wristwatch device
at its “Unpacked” event on Sept. 4.
Sunday, 18 August 2013
Windows XP. Because a safety update will never grow to be out there
Microsoft has reminded, cajoled, and pleaded with customers to move off of
Windows XP prior to assistance for its old OS expires subsequent year. Now
Microsoft warns customers that they may be topic to “zero-day” threats for the
rest of their lives if they do not migrate.
“The pretty very first month that Microsoft releases safety updates for supported versions of Windows, attackers will reverse engineer these updates, obtain the vulnerabilities, and test Windows XP to determine if it shares these vulnerabilities,” he wrote. “If it does windows 7 professional retail version, attackers will try to create exploit code which will take advantage of these vulnerabilities on Windows XP. Because a safety update will never grow to be out there for Windows XP to address these vulnerabilities, Windows XP will essentially have a ‘zero-day’ vulnerability forever.”
Zero-day vulnerabilities refer towards the way in which hackers can attack an operating method or other code just before a patch is released, fixing the vulnerability. Since Microsoft will never patch Windows XP once more right after April 2014, at some point some vulneability that affects XP will be discovered.
Involving July 2012 and July 2013, Windows XP was an impacted item in 45 Microsoft safety bulletins. Thirty of these also impacted Windows 7 and Windows 8, Rains wrote.
Rains acknowledges that some protections in XP will assist mitigate attacks, and third-party antimalware computer software could possibly supply some protection.
“The challenge here is the fact that you will never know, with any self-confidence, in the event the trusted computing base with the program can actually be trusted for the reason that attackers will likely be armed with public understanding of zero day exploits in Windows XP that could allow them to compromise the system and possibly run the code of their decision,” Rains wrote.
That is the exact same argument that some have not too long ago utilized, claiming that hackers will “bank” their zero-day XP attacks till right after subsequent April, then unleash them around the unprotected herds of XP machines. As Rains notes, the sophistication of malware has only enhanced, which means that your XP machine is a lot more vulnerable, not much less. PCWorld’s Answer Line columnist, Lincoln Spector, agrees.
The problem that some XP users have is that they’re so in adore with the way that Windows XP does items that they’re reluctant to migrate, specially to Windows 8. Effectively, Windows 7 machines do exist, that provide functionality related to XP: here’s ways to uncover them.
The bottom line is this: whilst Microsoft stands to gain from arguing that customers need to upgrade, the truth is: they do. So if you are nevertheless on Windows XP, begin considering a migration technique.
http://www.windows7retailpack.com/microsoft-windows-7-professional-3264-bit-full-retail-pack-p-3527.html
“The pretty very first month that Microsoft releases safety updates for supported versions of Windows, attackers will reverse engineer these updates, obtain the vulnerabilities, and test Windows XP to determine if it shares these vulnerabilities,” he wrote. “If it does windows 7 professional retail version, attackers will try to create exploit code which will take advantage of these vulnerabilities on Windows XP. Because a safety update will never grow to be out there for Windows XP to address these vulnerabilities, Windows XP will essentially have a ‘zero-day’ vulnerability forever.”
Zero-day vulnerabilities refer towards the way in which hackers can attack an operating method or other code just before a patch is released, fixing the vulnerability. Since Microsoft will never patch Windows XP once more right after April 2014, at some point some vulneability that affects XP will be discovered.
Involving July 2012 and July 2013, Windows XP was an impacted item in 45 Microsoft safety bulletins. Thirty of these also impacted Windows 7 and Windows 8, Rains wrote.
Rains acknowledges that some protections in XP will assist mitigate attacks, and third-party antimalware computer software could possibly supply some protection.
“The challenge here is the fact that you will never know, with any self-confidence, in the event the trusted computing base with the program can actually be trusted for the reason that attackers will likely be armed with public understanding of zero day exploits in Windows XP that could allow them to compromise the system and possibly run the code of their decision,” Rains wrote.
That is the exact same argument that some have not too long ago utilized, claiming that hackers will “bank” their zero-day XP attacks till right after subsequent April, then unleash them around the unprotected herds of XP machines. As Rains notes, the sophistication of malware has only enhanced, which means that your XP machine is a lot more vulnerable, not much less. PCWorld’s Answer Line columnist, Lincoln Spector, agrees.
The problem that some XP users have is that they’re so in adore with the way that Windows XP does items that they’re reluctant to migrate, specially to Windows 8. Effectively, Windows 7 machines do exist, that provide functionality related to XP: here’s ways to uncover them.
The bottom line is this: whilst Microsoft stands to gain from arguing that customers need to upgrade, the truth is: they do. So if you are nevertheless on Windows XP, begin considering a migration technique.
http://www.windows7retailpack.com/microsoft-windows-7-professional-3264-bit-full-retail-pack-p-3527.html
Friday, 2 August 2013
Time Warner Cable drops CBS as talks over fees fall short
Notes that CBS is blocking full-episode streaming on its Web site for some
with Time Warner Cable as their broadband provider.
With changes in technology complicating the balance of power between television creators and distributors, CBS and Time Warner Cable failed to reach an agreement on fees Friday. After weeks of talks and multiple deadline extensions, the broadcaster's flagship network went dark for the cable giant's subscribers in several major U.S. cities.
CBS being dropped from a cable system for the first time in its history opens the door for companies like Aereo, the online streamer of over-the-air broadcasts, to deliver those transmissions in real time for Time Warner subscribers in New York. Time Warner subscribers can also turn online to CBS's Web site or Amazon to watch popular shows like "Under the Dome."
Time Warner Cable, on a screen that pops up where CBS's programming should be, is directing its subscribers to turn to CBS.com to watch, but CBS appears to be eliminating the option to watch full episodes on its Web site for some. In New York, people with Time Warner Cable as their broadband provider couldn't access any CBS full-length videos online, nor could people with TWC as their provider in other parts of the country unaffected by the blackout.
"If Time Warner Cable is a customer's internet service provider, then their access to CBS full episode content via online and mobile platforms has been suspended as a result of Time Warner Cable's decision to drop CBS and Showtime from their market," CBS spokeswoman Dana McClintock said in an email. "As soon as CBS is restored on Time Warner Cable systems in affected markets, that content will be accessible again."
Time Warner Cable spokeswoman Maureen Huff said CBS should not be allowed to abuse the privilege of using publicly owned airwaves to deliver its programming. "CBS has shown utter lack of regard for consumers by blocking Time Warner Cable's customers, including our high-speed data only customers, from accessing their shows on their free website," she said.
CBS, which is the parent company of CNET, said in a statement it "deeply regrets" that Time Warner Cable has dropped its network in New York, Los Angeles, and Dallas, as well as other smaller markets. It criticized Time Warner for "indulging in pointless brinksmanship" and twisting the facts to the public, and said it is eager to make an agreement with "fair compensation for the most-watched television network with the most popular content in the world."
"We hope and believe this period of darkness will be short," the broadcaster said.
Time Warner Cable said that when it agreed to continue talks until Friday, it expected to engage in a meaningful negotiation with CBS. "Since then, CBS has refused to have a productive discussion," it said.
"It's become clear that no matter how much time we give them, they're not willing to come to reasonable terms," it added in a statement.
In addition to the blackout of CBS in select markets, CBS properties Showtime, TMC, FLIX, and Smithsonian are also going dark for all subscribers.
CBS Corp. and Time Warner Cable have been negotiating a new carriage pact with under multiple extensions to their previous agreement that expired June 30.
Failing to reach an agreement on retransmission fees -- money that CBS requires from TWC to carry the channel for its subscribers -- comes as customers who lose CBS stations face more online alternatives. Time Warner has gone so far as to encourage New York customers to explore Aereo, the online streamer of over-the-air broadcasts, to pick up the broadcasts that have been dropped from its cable packages. Usually, many CBS shows are available on the network's own Web site, typically for a limited window of time, and Amazon Prime customers can watch "Under the Dome" on its Instant Video service four days after they run.
With changes in technology complicating the balance of power between television creators and distributors, CBS and Time Warner Cable failed to reach an agreement on fees Friday. After weeks of talks and multiple deadline extensions, the broadcaster's flagship network went dark for the cable giant's subscribers in several major U.S. cities.
CBS being dropped from a cable system for the first time in its history opens the door for companies like Aereo, the online streamer of over-the-air broadcasts, to deliver those transmissions in real time for Time Warner subscribers in New York. Time Warner subscribers can also turn online to CBS's Web site or Amazon to watch popular shows like "Under the Dome."
Time Warner Cable, on a screen that pops up where CBS's programming should be, is directing its subscribers to turn to CBS.com to watch, but CBS appears to be eliminating the option to watch full episodes on its Web site for some. In New York, people with Time Warner Cable as their broadband provider couldn't access any CBS full-length videos online, nor could people with TWC as their provider in other parts of the country unaffected by the blackout.
"If Time Warner Cable is a customer's internet service provider, then their access to CBS full episode content via online and mobile platforms has been suspended as a result of Time Warner Cable's decision to drop CBS and Showtime from their market," CBS spokeswoman Dana McClintock said in an email. "As soon as CBS is restored on Time Warner Cable systems in affected markets, that content will be accessible again."
Time Warner Cable spokeswoman Maureen Huff said CBS should not be allowed to abuse the privilege of using publicly owned airwaves to deliver its programming. "CBS has shown utter lack of regard for consumers by blocking Time Warner Cable's customers, including our high-speed data only customers, from accessing their shows on their free website," she said.
CBS, which is the parent company of CNET, said in a statement it "deeply regrets" that Time Warner Cable has dropped its network in New York, Los Angeles, and Dallas, as well as other smaller markets. It criticized Time Warner for "indulging in pointless brinksmanship" and twisting the facts to the public, and said it is eager to make an agreement with "fair compensation for the most-watched television network with the most popular content in the world."
"We hope and believe this period of darkness will be short," the broadcaster said.
Time Warner Cable said that when it agreed to continue talks until Friday, it expected to engage in a meaningful negotiation with CBS. "Since then, CBS has refused to have a productive discussion," it said.
"It's become clear that no matter how much time we give them, they're not willing to come to reasonable terms," it added in a statement.
In addition to the blackout of CBS in select markets, CBS properties Showtime, TMC, FLIX, and Smithsonian are also going dark for all subscribers.
CBS Corp. and Time Warner Cable have been negotiating a new carriage pact with under multiple extensions to their previous agreement that expired June 30.
Failing to reach an agreement on retransmission fees -- money that CBS requires from TWC to carry the channel for its subscribers -- comes as customers who lose CBS stations face more online alternatives. Time Warner has gone so far as to encourage New York customers to explore Aereo, the online streamer of over-the-air broadcasts, to pick up the broadcasts that have been dropped from its cable packages. Usually, many CBS shows are available on the network's own Web site, typically for a limited window of time, and Amazon Prime customers can watch "Under the Dome" on its Instant Video service four days after they run.
Microsoft and Computer makers must convince the masses
Windows 8 keeps clawing its way up the market place share charts, but not
in the expense of Windows 7 or Windows XP.
In line with Netmarketshare, Windows 8’s market share now stands at five.4 %, up 0.3 percent from a month ago when it lastly surpassed Windows Vista. Once again, Vista’s marketplace share declined last month, this time by about 0.38 percent, to a total of four.24 percent.
Meanwhile, Windows 7 and Windows XP are holding robust. In actual fact, Windows 7’s market place share improved last month by 0.12 %, and Windows XP saw a 0.02 percent bump in marketplace share in spite of the looming finish of XP assistance by Microsoft. Both Windows 7 and XP remain one of the most widely-used operating systems by far, with 44.49 percent and 37.19 percent of your market place, respectively, based on Netmarketshare.
In other words, any market share that Windows eight gained last month appears to be in the expense of Windows Vista.
When it’s not surprising that customers are eager to upgrade from the widely-panned operating technique, acquiring people to switch from XP or Windows 7 might be tougher for Microsoft, especially amongst users who desire to stick having a standard desktop interface.
Windows eight.1 will make some concessions for all those users, with all the return in the Commence button, a boot-to-desktop option, quicker access to sophisticated desktop functions, and also a strategy to prevent modern-style menus from popping up in the course of desktop use.
But ultimately, Microsoft and Computer makers must convince the masses that they require to upgrade their hardware to touch-enabled laptops, hybrids, or desktops. More affordable touchscreen devices could support on that front, but it’ll most likely be a though just before the market place share needle moves a great deal for Windows XP and Windows 7.
In line with Netmarketshare, Windows 8’s market share now stands at five.4 %, up 0.3 percent from a month ago when it lastly surpassed Windows Vista. Once again, Vista’s marketplace share declined last month, this time by about 0.38 percent, to a total of four.24 percent.
Meanwhile, Windows 7 and Windows XP are holding robust. In actual fact, Windows 7’s market place share improved last month by 0.12 %, and Windows XP saw a 0.02 percent bump in marketplace share in spite of the looming finish of XP assistance by Microsoft. Both Windows 7 and XP remain one of the most widely-used operating systems by far, with 44.49 percent and 37.19 percent of your market place, respectively, based on Netmarketshare.
In other words, any market share that Windows eight gained last month appears to be in the expense of Windows Vista.
When it’s not surprising that customers are eager to upgrade from the widely-panned operating technique, acquiring people to switch from XP or Windows 7 might be tougher for Microsoft, especially amongst users who desire to stick having a standard desktop interface.
Windows eight.1 will make some concessions for all those users, with all the return in the Commence button, a boot-to-desktop option, quicker access to sophisticated desktop functions, and also a strategy to prevent modern-style menus from popping up in the course of desktop use.
But ultimately, Microsoft and Computer makers must convince the masses that they require to upgrade their hardware to touch-enabled laptops, hybrids, or desktops. More affordable touchscreen devices could support on that front, but it’ll most likely be a though just before the market place share needle moves a great deal for Windows XP and Windows 7.
Tuesday, 23 July 2013
ands On With the New Motorola Droids
Motorola announced three new exclusive phones for Verizon Wireless today.
The Droid Ultra, Droid Mini, and Droid Maxx wrap the current version of Android
in slim Kevlar, adding a mix of Verizon and Motorola features to ice the
cake.
The three phones have a lot in common: they're all unibody, made of very smooth Kevlar with shiny, visually textured backs that tend to get fingerprinty, and ridged power and volume buttons on the side. (The SIM card slot is actually in the volume rocker.) They all have 10-megapixel cameras on the back and 2-megapixel shooters on the front. The batteries are sealed in, and there are no memory card slots. They'll all come in black and a deep Verizon red, and they all have 720p displays; the Ultra and Maxx have 5-inch Super AMOLED HD displays, while the Mini has a 4.3-inch TFT LCD.
The Mini is a tight little device. If I was personally with Verizon, I'd definitely consider it as my actual phone. All three phones are very well-built, with an elegant, solid look to them.
What Is The X8 Chipset?
The phones run on Motorola's "X8" chipset, which is mostly a rebranded dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro running at 1.73-GHz with Adreno 320 graphics. Motorola's secret sauce may be the two additional chips the company has been promoting, which handle "contextual computing" and voice processing. I ran the Antutu benchmark and got 18573, if you're curious.
"It's really a system architecture rather than developing the ASIC," Motorola product manager Jeff Snow said.
According to Snow, the voice processing DSP allows the phone to recognize voices even when apparently turned off; you can wake up Google Now by hollering at it without waking up the phone by hand first. The contextual computing chip, meanwhile, seems to function as a very low-power, off-duty CPU, doing things like maintaining time and status information on the screen without involving the more power-hungry main processors.
This isn't "stock Android." There are tiers of Motorola and Verizon features here. Motorola adds an ability to launch the camera from standby mode by wobbling the phone in midair, something it calls Quick Capture. There's also an always-listening Google Now mode, where Now can respond even if the phone is apparently asleep, and something Motorola calls "Active Display," which wakes up only a small part of an AMOLED screen to show status information, to save battery.
Motorola Assist, meanwhile, is Motorola's new version of Smart Actions, which sets your phone into various modes when you're driving, in a meeting or asleep, for instance. The most intriguing thing about Assist, actually, is that it uses the same fonts and visual design as Google Now, making it look like a core Android feature.
Exclusive to Verizon are Droid Zap and Droid Command Center. Droid Zap is a slightly oddball photo-sharing app which lets you toss photos up into a geotagged, temporary cloud, which other people with the Droid Zap app within 300 feet will be able to download. It isn't peer-to-peer, but it kind of makes you think it is. Droid Command Center is a bubbly little home-screen weather, time and battery widget.
The new Droids also come with the Ingress augmented-reality game preloaded, and each Droid buyer gets five Ingress invites to distribute to friends.
Oh, and by the way: the phones don't default to screaming "DROID" at you as the notification sound. The default ringtone does say "Droid," but at the end of the ring.
Droids vs. Droids vs. Moto X
The big difference between these phones is in size, battery life and price. The $99 Droid Mini fits very securely into even the smallest hands. It's a little bit thicker than the Ultra 8.9mm, and has the lowest-capacity battery at 2000mAh, but I think that will balance out with the lower power draw of a 4.3-inch as opposed to a 5-inch screen.
The $199 Droid Ultra and the $299 Droid Maxx are the same phone with different batteries and memory capacities. The Ultra uses a 2130mAh battery to keep its 7.2mm slimness and packs 16GB of storage, while the Maxx packs in a huge 3500mAh battery, which Motorola says will run the phone for a full 48 hours, and 32GB. At 8.5mm, it still feels extremely slim.
The Droid launch is just the beginning of Motorola's summer assault. Tomorrow, we'll hear from Motorola's parent company Google about Android 4.3, and on August 1, we'll see Motorola's flagship Moto X phone. When I asked Motorola reps about whether these Droids meant the X wouldn't be coming to Verizon, they demurred.
We did get a few hints about the X, though. It's likely to use this X8 chipset, and it'll probably have the Motorola features which we heard about here: touchless control, active display, quick camera launch, the new camera app and probably Motorola Assist. We'll have to wait for next week to learn more.
The three new Droids are available for pre-order now, and they'll hit shelves on August 20.
The three phones have a lot in common: they're all unibody, made of very smooth Kevlar with shiny, visually textured backs that tend to get fingerprinty, and ridged power and volume buttons on the side. (The SIM card slot is actually in the volume rocker.) They all have 10-megapixel cameras on the back and 2-megapixel shooters on the front. The batteries are sealed in, and there are no memory card slots. They'll all come in black and a deep Verizon red, and they all have 720p displays; the Ultra and Maxx have 5-inch Super AMOLED HD displays, while the Mini has a 4.3-inch TFT LCD.
The Mini is a tight little device. If I was personally with Verizon, I'd definitely consider it as my actual phone. All three phones are very well-built, with an elegant, solid look to them.
What Is The X8 Chipset?
The phones run on Motorola's "X8" chipset, which is mostly a rebranded dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro running at 1.73-GHz with Adreno 320 graphics. Motorola's secret sauce may be the two additional chips the company has been promoting, which handle "contextual computing" and voice processing. I ran the Antutu benchmark and got 18573, if you're curious.
"It's really a system architecture rather than developing the ASIC," Motorola product manager Jeff Snow said.
According to Snow, the voice processing DSP allows the phone to recognize voices even when apparently turned off; you can wake up Google Now by hollering at it without waking up the phone by hand first. The contextual computing chip, meanwhile, seems to function as a very low-power, off-duty CPU, doing things like maintaining time and status information on the screen without involving the more power-hungry main processors.
This isn't "stock Android." There are tiers of Motorola and Verizon features here. Motorola adds an ability to launch the camera from standby mode by wobbling the phone in midair, something it calls Quick Capture. There's also an always-listening Google Now mode, where Now can respond even if the phone is apparently asleep, and something Motorola calls "Active Display," which wakes up only a small part of an AMOLED screen to show status information, to save battery.
Motorola Assist, meanwhile, is Motorola's new version of Smart Actions, which sets your phone into various modes when you're driving, in a meeting or asleep, for instance. The most intriguing thing about Assist, actually, is that it uses the same fonts and visual design as Google Now, making it look like a core Android feature.
Exclusive to Verizon are Droid Zap and Droid Command Center. Droid Zap is a slightly oddball photo-sharing app which lets you toss photos up into a geotagged, temporary cloud, which other people with the Droid Zap app within 300 feet will be able to download. It isn't peer-to-peer, but it kind of makes you think it is. Droid Command Center is a bubbly little home-screen weather, time and battery widget.
The new Droids also come with the Ingress augmented-reality game preloaded, and each Droid buyer gets five Ingress invites to distribute to friends.
Oh, and by the way: the phones don't default to screaming "DROID" at you as the notification sound. The default ringtone does say "Droid," but at the end of the ring.
Droids vs. Droids vs. Moto X
The big difference between these phones is in size, battery life and price. The $99 Droid Mini fits very securely into even the smallest hands. It's a little bit thicker than the Ultra 8.9mm, and has the lowest-capacity battery at 2000mAh, but I think that will balance out with the lower power draw of a 4.3-inch as opposed to a 5-inch screen.
The $199 Droid Ultra and the $299 Droid Maxx are the same phone with different batteries and memory capacities. The Ultra uses a 2130mAh battery to keep its 7.2mm slimness and packs 16GB of storage, while the Maxx packs in a huge 3500mAh battery, which Motorola says will run the phone for a full 48 hours, and 32GB. At 8.5mm, it still feels extremely slim.
The Droid launch is just the beginning of Motorola's summer assault. Tomorrow, we'll hear from Motorola's parent company Google about Android 4.3, and on August 1, we'll see Motorola's flagship Moto X phone. When I asked Motorola reps about whether these Droids meant the X wouldn't be coming to Verizon, they demurred.
We did get a few hints about the X, though. It's likely to use this X8 chipset, and it'll probably have the Motorola features which we heard about here: touchless control, active display, quick camera launch, the new camera app and probably Motorola Assist. We'll have to wait for next week to learn more.
The three new Droids are available for pre-order now, and they'll hit shelves on August 20.
Where it made use of to be far more common
The iPad garnered the reputation as a brand new variety of device designed
for doing entertaining items at household. People had been promptly taken with
all the fact that the iPad could do a great deal of enjoyable points, endearing
it towards the masses. Then developers started writing thousands of apps for the
iPad that started to bridge entertaining stuff with activities usually done on a
Computer, even Windows PCs. Customers noticed that the Windows Pc (desktop or
laptop) that they kept at residence was becoming employed less and significantly
less. Ultimately they were only working with Windows at operate.
A familiar sight in public is a person with an iPad in hand, or one becoming employed using a keyboard case. Where it made use of to be far more common to see persons employing Windows laptops of varying sizes in public venues lots of of them happen to be replaced with the iPad. Much more considerably, iPad users usually are not just performing exciting stuff that tablets are believed to be created for, they are doing almost everything they used to windows 7 professional retail box perform with the forgotten Windows laptop back at household.
Microsoft saw this coming and radically changed the design and style of Windows to perform on tablets, desktops, and laptops. The people in Redmond saw the writing on the wall and knew they had to alter the OS into a tablet OS to keep Windows within the household. They currently had the enterprise locked up so bringing Windows towards the tablet was an work to help keep people employing the OS at home.
Make no error, the Surface RT was firmly aimed at obtaining shoppers to think about Windows on house tablets, and that work has failed. These wanting to use a straightforward tablet at house have pretty significantly currently adopted the iPad. It sports a mobile type element that runs a straightforward OS made specifically for the tablet. Confident iOS can also be a phone platform but Apple has adapted it to deal with the iPad nicely. It was also in a position to acquire app developers to adapt or make iPad-specific versions of apps to operate effectively on the slate.
I like my ThinkPad Tablet 2, a nice Windows tablet. It requires benefit of Windows eight, in particular all the tablet functions Microsoft implemented for that objective. But when I show it (or any Windows tablet) to folks I get quite considerably the identical reaction.
The discussion proceeds with me explaining how it is possible to run Windows apps and how new apps are becoming written for the Windows 8 app shop. That is followed by a conversation that tends to make it clear the other party not simply has no desire to run Windows and its apps on a tablet, they genuinely cannot see why any one would choose to do that. The iPad does anything they want a tablet to perform and much more so why would they want to use a tablet with Windows?
For a lot of shoppers Windows represents perform. It really is around the personal computer within the office and they "have" to utilize it there. They try to remember all the times they had to acquire the IT folks to come repair the Pc that stopped performing something. They feel of how they can not visit all the cool websites since they're blocked at function, which they come to assume of as a Windows thing. They believe of how trouble-free their household computing has turn into because they just naturally began performing it all on the iPad at home.
Most of the people I interact with about Windows on tablets who like it, and are excited about Windows 8, are those who either make a living within the Windows ecosystem or have a specific require for making use of Windows outside the scope of standard property computing. Possessing complete Windows within a tablet kind is just what they must do what they want each for work and at dwelling.
Regrettably for Microsoft, there aren't adequate of those enthusiasts to produce a difference, as proven by each the Surface RT debacle, and low Surface Pro sales (compared to the iPad). The vast majority have currently been shown that their beloved iPad is all they will need outdoors of function. The iPad has completely replaced Computer usage in the residence for a lot of owners and kicked Windows back towards the office.
A familiar sight in public is a person with an iPad in hand, or one becoming employed using a keyboard case. Where it made use of to be far more common to see persons employing Windows laptops of varying sizes in public venues lots of of them happen to be replaced with the iPad. Much more considerably, iPad users usually are not just performing exciting stuff that tablets are believed to be created for, they are doing almost everything they used to windows 7 professional retail box perform with the forgotten Windows laptop back at household.
Microsoft saw this coming and radically changed the design and style of Windows to perform on tablets, desktops, and laptops. The people in Redmond saw the writing on the wall and knew they had to alter the OS into a tablet OS to keep Windows within the household. They currently had the enterprise locked up so bringing Windows towards the tablet was an work to help keep people employing the OS at home.
Make no error, the Surface RT was firmly aimed at obtaining shoppers to think about Windows on house tablets, and that work has failed. These wanting to use a straightforward tablet at house have pretty significantly currently adopted the iPad. It sports a mobile type element that runs a straightforward OS made specifically for the tablet. Confident iOS can also be a phone platform but Apple has adapted it to deal with the iPad nicely. It was also in a position to acquire app developers to adapt or make iPad-specific versions of apps to operate effectively on the slate.
I like my ThinkPad Tablet 2, a nice Windows tablet. It requires benefit of Windows eight, in particular all the tablet functions Microsoft implemented for that objective. But when I show it (or any Windows tablet) to folks I get quite considerably the identical reaction.
The discussion proceeds with me explaining how it is possible to run Windows apps and how new apps are becoming written for the Windows 8 app shop. That is followed by a conversation that tends to make it clear the other party not simply has no desire to run Windows and its apps on a tablet, they genuinely cannot see why any one would choose to do that. The iPad does anything they want a tablet to perform and much more so why would they want to use a tablet with Windows?
For a lot of shoppers Windows represents perform. It really is around the personal computer within the office and they "have" to utilize it there. They try to remember all the times they had to acquire the IT folks to come repair the Pc that stopped performing something. They feel of how they can not visit all the cool websites since they're blocked at function, which they come to assume of as a Windows thing. They believe of how trouble-free their household computing has turn into because they just naturally began performing it all on the iPad at home.
Most of the people I interact with about Windows on tablets who like it, and are excited about Windows 8, are those who either make a living within the Windows ecosystem or have a specific require for making use of Windows outside the scope of standard property computing. Possessing complete Windows within a tablet kind is just what they must do what they want each for work and at dwelling.
Regrettably for Microsoft, there aren't adequate of those enthusiasts to produce a difference, as proven by each the Surface RT debacle, and low Surface Pro sales (compared to the iPad). The vast majority have currently been shown that their beloved iPad is all they will need outdoors of function. The iPad has completely replaced Computer usage in the residence for a lot of owners and kicked Windows back towards the office.
Sunday, 14 July 2013
Microsoft Cuts Price of Surface RT Tablet by Up to 30%
Microsoft MSFT -0.04% has cut the price of its Surface RT tablet by $150,
or as much as 30%, as even some Microsoft partners have called the device a
sales laggard.
The software company's websites on Sunday began showing a price of $349 for the least-expensive model of the tablet, without a cover that doubles as a keyboard for the device. That model, which launched last fall, previously cost $499 without the cover-keyboard combination.
Microsoft also cut the price on the Surface RT model with twice as much memory to $449 from $599. That version, with a type of cover-keyboard combination, now costs $549, down from $699.
Websites of Best Buy Co. BBY +1.19% and Staples Inc. SPLS +0.36% also list the discounted prices for the Surface RT.
"We've been seeing great success with pricing and cover promotions over the past several months on Surface RT in the U.S. and other markets," a Microsoft spokesman said. "People who buy Surface love Surface, and we're excited about all those additional people out sharing their excitement for Surface with other people."
Technology-news website the Verge earlier reported Microsoft was likely to start reducing prices on the Surface RT.
The Surface RT has been a disappointment to some people at companies involved with the device. Those people have said sales of the Surface RT haven't lived up to hopes, and that Microsoft didn't do enough to clarify the reasons people should choose the RT version of Windows, which doesn't run older Windows-compatible software programs, such as iTunes or Quicken financial software.
The chief executive of Nvidia Corp., NVDA +0.07% which makes the computer chips that power the Surface RT, said in March that sales of Windows RT devices have been "disappointing" so far. Windows RT devices are powered by the same type of battery-conserving computer chip that is in the guts of smartphones and devices like the Apple iPad.
Microsoft has tried discounts on Surface RT before. More than a month ago, Microsoft started offering people who bought a Surface RT a free cover that doubles as the device's keyboard. The covers typically cost $119 or $129 each.
It isn't uncommon for companies to offer discounts on consumer-electronic devices, particularly to clear out inventory before new models go on sale. Microsoft hasn't announced new versions of the Surface.
At a conference last week, company executives showed a slide that indicated updates were coming to Surface RT and to the more powerful version, Surface Pro.
The Wall Street Journal also reported in April that Microsoft is working on a smaller version of the Surface, on the heels of popular 7-inch to 8-inch tablet computers like Apple's iPad Mini and the Nexus 7 from Google Inc.
The software company's websites on Sunday began showing a price of $349 for the least-expensive model of the tablet, without a cover that doubles as a keyboard for the device. That model, which launched last fall, previously cost $499 without the cover-keyboard combination.
Microsoft also cut the price on the Surface RT model with twice as much memory to $449 from $599. That version, with a type of cover-keyboard combination, now costs $549, down from $699.
Websites of Best Buy Co. BBY +1.19% and Staples Inc. SPLS +0.36% also list the discounted prices for the Surface RT.
"We've been seeing great success with pricing and cover promotions over the past several months on Surface RT in the U.S. and other markets," a Microsoft spokesman said. "People who buy Surface love Surface, and we're excited about all those additional people out sharing their excitement for Surface with other people."
Technology-news website the Verge earlier reported Microsoft was likely to start reducing prices on the Surface RT.
The Surface RT has been a disappointment to some people at companies involved with the device. Those people have said sales of the Surface RT haven't lived up to hopes, and that Microsoft didn't do enough to clarify the reasons people should choose the RT version of Windows, which doesn't run older Windows-compatible software programs, such as iTunes or Quicken financial software.
The chief executive of Nvidia Corp., NVDA +0.07% which makes the computer chips that power the Surface RT, said in March that sales of Windows RT devices have been "disappointing" so far. Windows RT devices are powered by the same type of battery-conserving computer chip that is in the guts of smartphones and devices like the Apple iPad.
Microsoft has tried discounts on Surface RT before. More than a month ago, Microsoft started offering people who bought a Surface RT a free cover that doubles as the device's keyboard. The covers typically cost $119 or $129 each.
It isn't uncommon for companies to offer discounts on consumer-electronic devices, particularly to clear out inventory before new models go on sale. Microsoft hasn't announced new versions of the Surface.
At a conference last week, company executives showed a slide that indicated updates were coming to Surface RT and to the more powerful version, Surface Pro.
The Wall Street Journal also reported in April that Microsoft is working on a smaller version of the Surface, on the heels of popular 7-inch to 8-inch tablet computers like Apple's iPad Mini and the Nexus 7 from Google Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)